Occult breast cancer: the uncommon presentation of a common disease
Editorial

Occult breast cancer: the uncommon presentation of a common disease

Angela Toss, Luca Moscetti, Stefano Cascinu

Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy

Correspondence to: Angela Toss. Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy. Email: angela.toss@unimore.it.

Provenance: This is an invited article commissioned by the Editorial Office, Chinese Clinical Oncology.

Comment on: Ge LP, Liu XY, Xiao Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of occult breast cancer: a SEER populationbased study. Cancer Manag Res 2018;10:4381-91.


Submitted Jan 10, 2019. Accepted for publication Jan 18, 2019.

doi: 10.21037/cco.2019.01.06


Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is defined as the presence of secondary lesions in the absence of any detectable primary tumor at the time of presentation. The CUP syndrome represents a rare condition with varying biologic behaviors and generally poor prognosis (1,2). However, substantial improvements have been made in treating some subgroups. One such subset consists of patients with occult breast cancer (OBC). OBC manifests as metastasis in the axillary lymph nodes without any evident primary breast lesion or distant disease on clinical and radiological examination. Such patients account for 0.3–1.0% of all breast cancer patients and are potentially curable when managed according to standard guidelines (3-6). Nevertheless, clinical-pathological features, treatment approaches and outcomes of OBC are still controversial, due to the extreme rarity of this disorder and the impossibility to carry on large population studies.

Ge and colleagues recently published an interesting population-based study utilizing the data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset, with the aims of describing the clinical-pathological characteristics, treatment and survival outcomes of OBC (7). The SEER Program collects cancer incidence data from US population-based cancer registries and provides publicly available information on cancer statistics. Nowadays, SEER covers approximately 34.6% of the US population and provides data on patient demographics, primary tumor site, tumor morphology, stage at diagnosis, type of treatment, and outcomes (8). The wide and detailed systematic data collection of cancer registries represents a unique and fundamental opportunity to obtain and analyze data on low incidence tumors, such as OBC. On this basis, in their analyses, the authors were able to compare the features and outcomes of 479 OBC to 115,739 non-OBC patients, to our knowledge the largest study population described up to now. Compared with non-OBC, OBC showed older age, more advanced stage, higher proportion of negative hormone receptor expression, higher proportion of HER2-positive status, greater likelihood of having ≥10 positive LNs, and lower likelihood of surgical treatment. Interestingly, OBC patients demonstrated a significant survival advantage over non-OBC patients and OBC patients undergoing axillary lymph-node dissection exhibited outcomes similar to those of the breast-conserving surgery group and the mastectomy group,

The work of Ge and colleagues is indeed a valuable contribution to better describe the features of this uncommon disorder, still several questions remains open. In particular, records of systemic therapies are not reported by SEER as well as the patterns of relapse. Moreover, HER2 status was available only after 2010 and the type of axillary lymph-node surgery performed was not specified, therefore, surrogate data were used to categorize the surgical approach. In addition, the immunohistochemical profile of each OBC was evaluated on the axillary lymph-nodes, which are not the primary sites of tumor and thus could present a different biologic profile as shown in previous research (9-11). Finally, this retrospective study enrolled patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2014, when the MRI examination was already available. However, the authors do not specify if all the OBC patients performed the breast MRI, in order to decrease the risk of misdiagnosis (12,13).

To conclude, as for the other rare conditions, future research should be directed in collecting and evaluating a larger cohort of patients with the aim to better understand the biological pathways and the clinical behavior of this uncommon type of breast cancer, in order to improve the clinical management strategies and outcomes.


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Neben K, Hübner G, Folprecht G, et al. Metastases in the Absence of a Primary Tumor: Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of CUP Syndrome. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008;105:733-40. [PubMed]
  2. Abbruzzese JL, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R, et al. Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2094-103. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Patel J, Nemoto T, Rosner D, et al. Axillary lymph node metastasis from an occult breast cancer. Cancer 1981;47:2923-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Rosen PP. Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with occult noninvasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 1980;46:1298-306. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Owen HW, Dockerty MB, Gray HK. Occult carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1954;98:302-8. [PubMed]
  6. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer. Version 3.2018. (Accessed the 9th January 2019). Available online: 6. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf
  7. Ge LP, Liu XY, Xiao Y, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of occult breast cancer: a SEER population-based study. Cancer Manag Res 2018;10:4381-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. (Accessed the 9th January 2019). Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov
  9. Amir E, Clemons M, Purdie CA, et al. Tissue confirmation of disease recurrence in breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of multi-centre, multi-disciplinary prospective studies. Cancer Treat Rev 2012;38:708-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Liedtke C, Broglio K, Moulder S, et al. Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009;20:1953-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Lindström LS, Karlsson E, Wilking UM, et al. Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2601-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Obdeijn AI, Bontenbal M, et al. MRI in patients with axillary metastases of occult breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;44:179-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology 1997;205:437-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Toss A, Moscetti L, Cascinu S. Occult breast cancer: the uncommon presentation of a common disease. Chin Clin Oncol 2019;8(Suppl 1):S10. doi: 10.21037/cco.2019.01.06

Download Citation